<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: spiritual history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mijah.com/2009/05/19/spiritual-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mijah.com/2009/05/19/spiritual-history/</link>
	<description>text pertaining to the love of God</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:02:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah James Lugg</title>
		<link>http://www.mijah.com/2009/05/19/spiritual-history/comment-page-1/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah James Lugg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 05:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mijah.com/?p=468#comment-2746</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Andrew, you bring up a good point and make a crucial distinction. There is a difference between saying that the Exodus account was written to describe the Christian life and saying that it was written as an account of a historical event. With that said I think it is appropriate to take OT passages and use them for illustrative purposes. For example, the story of Joseph provides a great illustration of Romans 8:28 and 2 Timothy 2:22. Does that make sense? Do you agree?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, you bring up a good point and make a crucial distinction. There is a difference between saying that the Exodus account was written to describe the Christian life and saying that it was written as an account of a historical event. With that said I think it is appropriate to take OT passages and use them for illustrative purposes. For example, the story of Joseph provides a great illustration of Romans 8:28 and 2 Timothy 2:22. Does that make sense? Do you agree?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew S Meredith</title>
		<link>http://www.mijah.com/2009/05/19/spiritual-history/comment-page-1/#comment-2735</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew S Meredith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mijah.com/?p=468#comment-2735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post. I had never realized that the Exodus symbolism dated back to Origen... Anyhow, I was wondering what you think of the validity of taking a Scriptural account and applying it to something immediate. So long as we don&#039;t say that the purpose of the Exodus account is to paint a picture of the human life, can we rely on it as an illustration? At first, it seems like a valid thing to do, but I don&#039;t want to &quot;play around&quot; with Scripture. What are your thoughts, Micah?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. I had never realized that the Exodus symbolism dated back to Origen&#8230; Anyhow, I was wondering what you think of the validity of taking a Scriptural account and applying it to something immediate. So long as we don&#8217;t say that the purpose of the Exodus account is to paint a picture of the human life, can we rely on it as an illustration? At first, it seems like a valid thing to do, but I don&#8217;t want to &#8220;play around&#8221; with Scripture. What are your thoughts, Micah?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
